![gay men feet party gay men feet party](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41qayB707dL._AC_SX466_.jpg)
‘No need to stand on my chest first, you can stand straight onto my face,’ says Brian, with scant regard for his eye sockets. When I see him at the end of the night, his hair is matted to the back of his head. He spends most of the five hour event lying on his back, by the wall, while women stand on his face. Brian, who’s in his late 40s, works in IT. I’m initiated into trampling by Brian, one of the two foot fetishists who run the party. It’s not just the sofas that are in demand – the floor is scattered with men being trampled, a practice that consists of standing on a man’s body – and sometimes his face. I understand that for the GOP to be gay-inclusive and get rid of its anti-gay policies, there must be gay Republicans brave and/or stupid enough to join and engage in the fight.On sofas all over the room, men are ‘worshipping’ the feet of women who call themselves ‘femdoms’ and ‘foot goddesses.’ Having paid up to £70 to attend the party, the men then pay £20 for every ten minutes they spend kissing, licking and sucking the feet of the ‘foot models.’ magazine? Or is there some ideological line in play and, if so, what is it? What in heaven’s name is the issue that trumps human dignity for gay, male Republicans like Ken Mehlman, who reigned as Bush’s campaign chairman and head of the Republican National Committee while Bush promoted an anti-same sex marriage amendment to the Constitution? What was Pete Williams, now an NBC correspondent, thinking during those years when he was a spokesperson for Dick Cheney?Īnd what about Trevor Potter, the former FEC chair and John McCain general counsel? How does he work for a man who went to his electoral death promising to defend “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”? What kind of mental twisting does Rick Santorum’s former senate communications director, Robert Traynham - black and gay - do to continue defending Santorum and his “man on dog” statements about gay sex?ĭoes Tony Fabrizio, Rick Perry’s openly gay pollster, poll for anyone who pays the bill? Would he poll for Obama, the Pope or Ms. I say gay men but what I really mean are mostly white gay men, usually middle or upper class - the guys who, but for their sexual orientation, would be as much a part of the 1 percent as the people who ultimately kick them to the curb and ask them to understand when their orientation becomes unseemly and problematic. Like Grenell, they take the fact that his partner’s name is included in private invitations as a signal of acceptance instead of simply good manners. he said during the primaries.Īll this is really just a continuation of a longtime Republican public/private split on queerness that a good number of gay men buy into. As far as I can tell, this is part of Romney’s wink-wink campaign to moderates and independents to ignore the rightwing b.s. Rather, I think he was intended as a sign to moderate and independent voters that Romney’s not so bad after all. I don’t think he was intended as a signal to the gay community, which will no doubt see Romney’s anti-same sex marriage and pro-”Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” stances as stronger reasons to vote against him than the appointment of a gay man might be to vote for him. I can only think of cynical reasons, though, for having hired Grenell in the first place. Why couldn’t he do this? Although the Bush administration originally told him the exclusion was due to the UN, this turned out not to be the case: The Bush administration flatly refused to acknowledge Grenell’s relationship on par with those of his heteroexual colleagues. Indeed, back at the UN, Grenell tried, unsuccessfully, to include his longtime partner in the Blue Book, a directory of UN spouses. The Romney campaign says Grenell’s sexuality was irrelevant, and it’s certainly true that as governor, Romney had gay staffers. Among other things, Grenell supports and strongly advocates for same sex marriage. Grenell now says he’s leaving of his own accord, because anti-gay forces in the GOP are distracting from Romney’s campaign by focusing on “personal” matters - “personal” matters here being his sexuality, which Grenell himself has made a big deal about. He’d worked, always out, for a number of GOP politicians before that. He came to them fully, publicly gay, having previously served as an out United Nations mission spokesperson during the George W.
![gay men feet party gay men feet party](https://imageio.forbes.com/specials-images/imageserve/5f7a8f0388e9f8da7c278403/Pride-In-London-2019/960x0.jpg)
Grenell’s sexuality was no surprise to anyone in Romney camp.
#GAY MEN FEET PARTY SERIES#
(He made headlines for a series of snarky, sexist tweets - all removed from his Twitter feed now - aimed at female political and media figures such as Hillary Clinton, Callista Gingrich and Rachel Maddow, whom he urged to “wear a necklace.”) Until just days ago, Grenell was the first ever out gay spokesperson for a Republican presidential campaign. The latest victim - if you can call a powerful, misogynistic heap of crap like this a victim - is Richard Grenell.